Can those good intentioned and good hearted people who have shown sympathy to the woman narrating this pathetic story please take a minute to think whether it is the true version of the story that was narrated? Some people are just good as posing themselves as victims when in reality they have caused immense grievance to other people. She is obviously manipulating this website's student population and has obviously done a good job influencing their students' judgments with a one-sided version. The sad thing is no one has bothered to check whether what she said is the truth and started bombarding the UTas lecture with malicious verbal attacks. I can assure you innocent students that you can be sued for malicious damage to one's reputation. Remember this is Australia.
In the case of a rental situation, a signed agreement is legally binding. When the agreement is still valid and the owner does not breach the contract, he/she can refuse to accept a replacing tenant. Why should they if the replacement is mentally disoriented, has a bad rental history or is perceived to be a problem to neighbours? Just do not exaggerate your rights. Everyone in Australia has a right, but within limits, unfortunately. |