找回密码
 注册

快捷登录

Kerri关于712期末考试题目错误的回复--愤怒

ta-xiao 2010-10-26 11:05:42 阅读 3566 来自: 澳大利亚
The person marking that question is aware of the various interpretations that can apply to the scenario, especially as both divisions produce things.  Rest assured that nobody will be penalised unfairly.
I am not able to discuss specifics of the exam, or anybody’s performance, until after the results are formally released and review applications are lodged – so that’s all I can say.  No need to worry though.
Best wishes for your remaining exams.

对于这样的回答你满意吗?谁会补偿我们浪费的审理题目的时间即便我们按照正确的方法做。
我们打算去complain,希望同学们即便不和我们一起去,也要以各种方式提出自己的抗议。


Kerri O'Donnell  BCom, CFE

(0)
ta-xiao

发表回复

评论列表(8条)

fqyyy 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

本帖最后由 fqyyy 于 2010-10-26 11:30 编辑

1,Kerri解释评分的人会考虑到大家对题目不同的理解,她认为这样公平了
2,楼主主要认为浪费的审题时间不公平

此外,个人觉得Kerri没这么大权利给大伙free mark,大伙要complain的话直接找更高级的人员估计更有效果
很苦恼的是。。。我对这题已经没印象了,完全靠第一印象做题
回复 · 2010-10-26 11:28:11
vicianpark 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

不觉得keri的回答有什么问题。。。希望大家考试都顺利
回复 · 2010-10-26 11:39:22
倒着打哈欠 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

Subject: 2 x typos in the Exam paper  Topic: Open Discussion - Assessment  
Author: Ms Kerri O'Donnell  Date: 26 October 2010 12:42 PM  

Hello all,
My apologies for the two typographical errors in the exam.  Although this is the first time any error has appeared in one of my exams, it is reasonably common for errors to appear in teaching materials and exam papers across all the disciplines, and actually everywhere in the workplace world, so this reinforces that you need to take note of the strategies offered by your lecturers for what to do if you have doubts, and act upon them when the need arises.  This includes asking questions, stating assumptions, and acting upon instructions for how to manage time spent on each question (remember 3 minutes per mark for this 60-mark exam), and from my post of 22/10/10: “If you get stuck, move on to the next question and come back to the more difficult one later.”

You should know that I can not comment on specific exam answers or anybody’s performance until after the exam results are formally released, and even then comments will be limited to private appointments made by completing the Application to view form at the level 5 reception desk.

However, I can make a general attempt to set your troubled minds at ease:  Nobody is being penalised for either doing the exam paper exactly as given, or for making an appropriate assumption/decision, as instructed many times in class.  

There is actually no problem because your marks are not affected by either typo as neither affects the point of the tasks themselves.  Your response to any question, regardless of your interpretation of one specific anomaly within it, will always reflect your understanding of the principles and processes fundamental to the task in general.  Marks are being awarded to all sensible answers.  Further explanation follows:

a.The Q3 subtotal error is completely irrelevant to the allocation task itself.  I only asked to make the announcement as a matter of honesty and transparency in case some students noticed it and worried unnecessarily that I had included tricks.  As stated many times, I do not include tricks in exams.  (I doubt very much that anybody would have noticed the subtotal didn’t match except for the one student who brought it to my attention.)  In any case, nobody will be penalised for doing Q3 either as given or as corrected.  

b.Nobody asked any question about Q4 during the 3.25 hour-long opportunity you had to help yourself.  That is what reading time is for, and lecturers are always contactable throughout exams.  Had even one person asked an invigilator, they would have phoned my mobile.  So while I take responsibility for two typographical errors in the exam paper (even though it was checked by three other people), I will not take responsibility for your failure to ask such a simple question.  
In addition, I instructed you all, many times, that if you have any doubts in an exam you should clearly state any assumption you need to make in order to construct your answer.  This applies to all types of theory application (EG: defining a relevant range) as well as other needs to place limits or reduce uncertainty.  A couple of students did this, and you are thanked very much for listening and learning.  Your clear statement of assumption has made it easier to award marks to your work (another instruction) regardless of what that assumption was.

Most people, however, apparently did not even notice the name typo, because most question papers present the exact answer expected.  

In any case, as per Q3, nobody will be penalised for doing Q4 as given, or self-corrected.

So where to from here?  If you wish to stay on MyLO discussing typos, then go for it.  You will achieve more, however, if you instead focus constructively on passing your remaining exams.  Remember that the same basic principles of preparation apply, so the generic exam preparation and technique handouts I posted in the unit’s Unit Information folder should be helpful for your other units too.   

If you are really worried about how to cope with exams, please contact a Faculty academic advisor immediately for advice.

Best wishes,

Kerri

这是kerri 关于错误问题在my lo discussion board 上的回复
回复 · 2010-10-26 14:54:53
ta-xiao 楼主 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

我发的是在discussion board她回复之前给我的信箱的邮件,后来在board里面出来个更绝的版本
回复 · 2010-10-26 15:52:05
没有如果 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

她的头就是William Magurie吧, 是带我们Bachelor cost accounting的老师,简直一级品.....
总之祝愿大家都pass......
回复 · 2010-10-26 16:22:01
chris.lee 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

就希望她能收下留情~~~别前面的概念一分都不给,那就悲剧了~~~
回复 · 2010-10-26 17:11:43
dabing 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

那个女魔头  哎 更年期还没过啊
回复 · 2010-10-26 17:25:10
emmapenn 来自: 澳大利亚

举报

唉~~大家好运吧~反正我是不包任何希望了~
回复 · 2010-10-26 19:59:44